Apac
  • Home
  • CXO Insights
  • CIO Views
  • News
  • Conferences
  • Newsletter
  • Whitepapers
  • About us
Apac
  • Admired Tech

    Agile

    AI Healthcare

    Artificial Intelligence

    Augmented Reality

    Aviation

    Big Data

    Blockchain

    Cloud

    Cryptocurrency

    Cyber Security

    DevOps

    Digital Transformation

    Drone

    HPC

    Infrared

    Internet of Things

    IT Services

    Marine Tech

    Networking

    PropTech

    Remote Work

    Robotics

    Scheduling Software

    Sensor Tech

    Simulation

    Smart City

    Software Testing

    Startup

    Storage

    Unified Communication

    Web Development

    Wireless

  • Automotive

    Banking

    Capital Market

    Construction

    E-Commerce

    Education

    FinTech

    Food and Beverages

    Gov and Public

    Healthcare

    Insurance

    Legal

    Logistics

    Manufacturing

    Media and Entertainment

    Metals and Mining

    Pharma and Life Science

    Retail

    Sports

    Travel and Hospitality

  • CISCO

    Google

    IBM

    Microsoft

    Oracle

    Salesforce

    SAP

    ServiceNow

  • Business Intelligence

    CEM

    Cloud-based Planning

    Cognitive

    Collaboration

    Compliance

    Contact Center

    Contact Tracing

    Contactless Payments

    Corporate Finance

    CRM

    Custom Software Development

    Data Center

    Digital Signage

    Enterprise Architecture

    Enterprise Asset Management

    Enterprise Communications

    Enterprise Contract Management

    Enterprise Performance Management

    ERP

    Facility Management

    Field Service

    Fleet Management

    Gamification

    HR Technology

    IT Infrastructure

    IT Service Management

    Managed Services

    PLM

    Procurement

    Product Management

    Project Management

    RegTech

    Revenue Management

    Sales Tech

Menu
    • Oracle
    • CISCO
    • Collaboration
    • Compliance
    • Contact Center
    • Healthcare
    • IT Service Management
    • Microsoft
    • Retail
    • MORE
    #

    Apac CIO Outlook Weekly Brief

    ×

    Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Apac CIO Outlook

    Subscribe

    loading

    THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING

    • Home
    • Oracle
    Editor's Pick (1 - 4 of 8)
    left
    Exploring the Internet of Things

    Dave Neitz, CIO, CDM Smith

    Practicing the Change

    Glenn Coles, CIO, Yamaha Motor Corporation

    ORACLE's Cloud Service

    Martin Ingram, CIO & SVP, Arise Virtual Solutions

    Being a CIO

    David Banger, CIO, John Holland

    True SDN and the Networking Revolution

    Stu Bailey, Founder & Chief Technology Officer, Infoblox

    Acquiring Talent with Sense of Urgency Remains a Challenge

    Tony Scotto,

    Exploring Further Possibilities in 'Work-at-Home-Workforce' Trend

    Dave Pearson, Executive Vice President & CIO, Sykes Enterprises

    Visual Understanding on Systems is Important in Dealing with Industry Complexities

    Bob Fecteau, CIO, SAIC

    right

    Does Enterprise Architecture have a Future?

    By Paul Ayers, Enterprise Architect, Oracle

    Tweet
    content-image

    Paul Ayers, Enterprise Architect, Oracle

    The concept of Enterprise Architecture (EA) is a sound one. Having a framework and skillsets, which can assist with informing technology decisions, reduce complexity, duplication and technical debt while ensuring an alignment to business strategy-it is an attractive lure. In most cases, EA teams emerged from IT divisions to provide technology leadership and assist in setting the strategic direction for an organisation’s technology investments. They are (or should be) the keeper, and reiterate the technology vision. However, in recent times these groups seem to have fallen out of favor. Do they have a future?

    It is the Program/Project management area where many organisations are spending their improvement dollars. This is because this area usually wears the brunt of project failures. However, this also takes the attention away from other capabilities like EA. The EA teams are being downsized and/or staffed with less experienced staff (as a cost reduction exercise). The EA groups are also typically painted with the IT brush therefore struggles to gain any credibility with business stakeholders.

    The focus of EA groups has also changed over the years. It has swung around from trying to do everything from documenting the current IT estates to developing technology roadmaps and target state architectures, from solution design to developing white papers on the latest technology trends. Most have also tried implementing some sort of EA framework so they can get others to understand what they actually do but this usually ends with mixed results. Most of these EA frameworks are more academic than practical so they are becoming extraneous in today’s fast moving business world.

    With the technology landscape changing quickly, business areas are getting impatient for change. With limited resources to undertake the work, EA groups are struggling to meet expectations. Indeed their relevance is being questioned in some circles.

    With The Technology Landscape Changing Quickly, Business Areas Are Getting Impatient For Change

    These groups haven’t helped themselves either by producing artifacts, patterns and new processes that are less than useful for projects to consume. In other words, EA groups have failed to understand their customer needs.

    Lacking creditability, what is starting to happen in a number of organizations is that projects are by passing EA and implementing technologies that are further complicating the already complicated IT eco-system and steadily adding to the current technical debt. It might only seem like a small thing on the surface, a project making a tactical decision to get the development team to build a required feature rather than leveraging an existing function or buying something from the marketplace, which is pre-built. The usual argument you hear from the project is that if they have to buy something new it will put pressure of the project timeline due to the procurement overheads. The bottom line is that it’s easier to task a developer to quickly whip something up. However, if the project gets its way, the end result is more duplication and/or bespoke code, which needs to be managed, updated, and maintained for the life of the system.

    Just like the investment in Project/ Program management offices, an EA practice needs investment in skilled (not in just technical but people skills as well), motivated, pragmatic, and business focused staff. It also needs agreed measures to demonstrate that the investment in the group is making a difference. These could be around a reduction in technical debt, or the number of reused corporate assets in solutions designs, or how many systems were designed using existing patterns. A measure of business improvement also needs to be included as EA should be more holistic than just IT.

    Investment in EA governance needs focus and is required to be incorporated in the Program/ Project management processes to ensure that the technical solutions abide by the architectural principles defined and approved by the EA Board. An active EA Board is critical in quality outcomes and should work hand-in-glove with the Program and Project methodologies and governance models. An Enterprise Architect should be embedded in Project teams for the life of the project and your senior EA should be a standing member of the Program Board. Most importantly an Enterprise Architect needs the authority to make judgment calls in an environment that is well supported by an appropriate organizational governance model.

    EA can be a key enabler for any organization as long as it has a clear focus of what problem(s) they are trying to solve–they can’t solve world peace! As each organization has a slightly different set of problems and levels of maturity, it’s not possible to recommend a single approach for your situation. This is why it is so important to list and prioritise your problems so that you can focus your precious resources. Undertaking such an exercise can be challenging as there can be so many issues that need attention but with some professional facilitation some good results can be achieved.

    Established in 1977 and headquartered in Redwood Shores, U.S., Oracle offers an integrated stack of business hardware and software systems and services to more than 380,000 customers in over 145 countries.

    Check this out: Top Oracle Solution Companies

    Weekly Brief

    loading
    Top 10 Oracle Solution Companies - 2020

    Featured Vendors

    Automated Systems Holdings Limited

    Thomas Lee, Senior Vice President, Director

    Fountainhead Technologies

    Jose Agostinho Salvador, President and CEO

    ON THE DECK

    Oracle 2020

    Top Vendors

    Oracle 2019

    Top Vendors

    Previous Next

    I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

    Read Also

    Pinpointing Weak Links in an Enterprise Security Chain: Helping Companies Battle Data and Content Security Challenges

    Pinpointing Weak Links in an Enterprise Security Chain: Helping Companies Battle Data and Content Security Challenges

    Hiro Imamura, SVP and GM, Business Imaging Solutions Group, Canon U.S.A. [NYSE:CAJ]
    Evolving Customer Relationship Management: Move Fast or Die Trying

    Evolving Customer Relationship Management: Move Fast or Die Trying

    Ed Ariel, Vice President of Service Operations, ezCater
    Importance of Customer Relationship Management Implementation

    Importance of Customer Relationship Management Implementation

    Drew Fredrick, Vice President, Home Building Technology, Clayton Homes
    How enterprise tech startups and corporates can collaborate for innovation

    How enterprise tech startups and corporates can collaborate for innovation

    Paul Santos, Managing Partner, Wavemaker Partners
    How an Initiative for Standardization and Modularization Leads to Cost Reduction, Increased Efficiency-and Better Teamwork

    How an Initiative for Standardization and Modularization Leads to Cost Reduction, Increased Efficiency-and Better Teamwork

    Faruk Bilgin, Global Director Manufacturing Engineering of Webasto Group
    Empowering the Retail Paradigm

    Empowering the Retail Paradigm

    Jason Williams, VP of Engineering, DICK’S Sporting Goods
    Fortifying the Retail Pardigm Amidst Uncertainities

    Fortifying the Retail Pardigm Amidst Uncertainities

    Vlad Yakubson, Head of Retail, yd.
    Journey from Intelligent Automation (IA) to Artificial Intelligence (AI)

    Journey from Intelligent Automation (IA) to Artificial Intelligence (AI)

    Sanjay Choubey, VP-IT, Briggs & Stratton
    Loading...

    Copyright © 2021 APAC CIOoutlook. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy  |  Sitemap |  Subscribe

    follow on linkedinfollow on twitter follow on rss
    This content is copyright protected

    However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

    https://oracle.apacciooutlook.com/cxoinsights/does-enterprise-architecture-have-a-future-nwid-4323.html